Join Goodreads. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Error rating book.
You can change your city from at this juncture. We serve personalized stories based arrange the selected city. Study explains. Let's work together to keep the banter civil. A weekly guide to the biggest developments in health, medicine after that wellbeing delivered to your inbox. Ago to Top. Select a City Accurate. Your current city: Mumbai Mumbai examination close. All Bombay Times print stories are available on.
Aim out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. All the rage an anonymous Internet-based survey, women answered open-ended questions about crushes. Women had varied experiences with, and diverse strategies for, managing crushes. The majority of women reported the crush did not impact their primary relationship; participants additionally reported that these crushes improved their desire for their partner.
This article explores the phenomenon by qualitative thematic analysis of 71 relevant online discussions. Five central themes emerge as of the data: 1 fictophilic paradox, 2 fictophilic stigma, 3 fictophilic behaviors, 4 fictophilic asexuality, and 5 fictophilic supernormal stimuli. The findings are further discussed and ultimately compared to the continuing debates on human sexuality in family member to fictional characters in Japanese media psychology. Contexts for future conversation after that research are suggested. This article provides an explorative analysis and conceptualization of a recently established notion that has at least three popular labels: fictosexuality, fictoromance, and fictophilia. All these labels point toward a strong and durable feeling of love, infatuation, or appeal for a fictional character. Accordingly, the goal here is to better absorb what fictophilia is. Second, the acquaint with intention is not to propose fictophilia as a problem or a ailment.